+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: pay on par with direct recruits

  1. #1
    Junior Member spenke is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    28

    Question pay on par with direct recruits

    Hai friends

    Everybody might have seen the minutes of 2nd anamoly committee meeting.

    The official side infomed that the matter of issue of orders regarding fixation of pay of promotees on par with the pay of direct recruits on or after 1st Jan 2006, as was done in Railways will be examined for issue of necessary orders in other departments.
    Is anybody know the status of the same?
    If not when will be the next anamoly committee meeting?

  2. #2
    Senior Member SASI is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    KERALA
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Dear friend,

    No positive development on grant of pay of dirrect recruits to others. The Third Meeting was scheduled to be held in june 2010. But there is no further news about the meeting.

    sasi
    Last edited by SASI; 04-10-2010 at 06:10 AM.

  3. #3
    Junior Member ankitsud36 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Hi Friends,

    It is very surprising to know that the Railway has implemented the orders for pay fixation of promotees at par with pay of direct recruits on or afterafter 1/1/96. Either it is the mockery of CCS(RP) Rules 2008 or other deptts. are silly enough. Govt. of India should clarify its stand immediately.

  4. #4
    Junior Member ankitsud36 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ankitsud36 View Post
    Hi Friends,

    It is very surprising to know that the Railway has implemented the orders for pay fixation of promotees at par with pay of direct recruits on or afterafter 1/1/96. Either it is the mockery of CCS(RP) Rules 2008 or other deptts. are silly enough. Govt. of India should clarify its stand immediately.
    Can any body forward me the link/letter issued by railway under which railway has implemented these orders?
    E-mail id - ankitsud36@gmail.com

  5. #5
    Senior Member SASI is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    KERALA
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ankitsud36 View Post
    Can any body forward me the link/letter issued by railway under which railway has implemented these orders?
    E-mail id - ankitsud36@gmail.com
    Link : http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/dir...be_28_2010.pdf

    sasi

  6. #6
    Junior Member ankitsud36 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SASI View Post
    There is clear cut instruction in this letter that the pay of senior(drawing less pay) can be stepped up at par with his junior borne on same cadre seniority( with direct recruit), but nowhere has written to upgrade the pay of all promotees at par with the minimum pay admissible to direct recruites.
    Please clarify,
    whether railway has fixed the pay of all promotees at par with minimum in the pay band pay as admissible to direct recruites (not borne on same cadre seniority)
    OR
    to only promotees with their counterparts in the same cadre seniority(direct recruites)

    regards
    -Ankit Sud
    Last edited by ankitsud36; 12-10-2010 at 08:36 AM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Victor is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    1,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ankitsud36 View Post
    There is clear cut instruction in this letter that the pay of senior(drawing less pay) can be stepped up at par with his junior borne on same cadre seniority( with direct recruit), but nowhere has written to upgrade the pay of all promotees at par with the minimum pay admissible to direct recruites.
    Please clarify,
    whether railway has fixed the pay of all promotees at par with minimum in the pay band pay as admissible to direct recruites (not borne on same cadre seniority)
    OR
    to only promotees with their counterparts in the same cadre seniority(direct recruites)

    regards
    -Ankit Sud
    The stepping up of pay is admissible to only those seniors who are drawing less pay than their junior direct recruits.

    Victor

  8. #8
    Senior Member SASI is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    KERALA
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ankitsud36 View Post
    There is clear cut instruction in this letter that the pay of senior(drawing less pay) can be stepped up at par with his junior borne on same cadre seniority( with direct recruit), but nowhere has written to upgrade the pay of all promotees at par with the minimum pay admissible to direct recruites.
    Please clarify,
    whether railway has fixed the pay of all promotees at par with minimum in the pay band pay as admissible to direct recruites (not borne on same cadre seniority)
    OR
    to only promotees with their counterparts in the same cadre seniority(direct recruites)

    regards
    -Ankit Sud
    Promotees are eligible for minimum pay admissible to direct recruits in cases where a junior has joined in the same cadre on direct recruitment after 1-1-2006.

    sasi
    Last edited by SASI; 13-10-2010 at 06:41 AM.

  9. #9
    Junior Member ankitsud36 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Delhi
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SASI View Post
    Promotees are eligible for minimum pay admissible to direct recruits in cases where a junior has joined in the same cadre on direct recruitment after 1-1-2006.

    sasi
    my query was regarding whether railway has stepped up pay the pay of all promotees to minimum of pay corresponding to grade pay admissible,irrespective of the cadre in contra vention of CCS RP Rules 2008, if not then what wrong the railway has done?
    Ankit Sud

  10. #10
    Senior Member SASI is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    KERALA
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ankitsud36 View Post
    my query was regarding whether railway has stepped up pay the pay of all promotees to minimum of pay corresponding to grade pay admissible,irrespective of the cadre in contra vention of CCS RP Rules 2008, if not then what wrong the railway has done?
    Ankit Sud
    Railways treats this as anomaly whereas CCS RP Rules 2008 does not. I think railways has done the right.

    sasi

  11. #11
    Senior Member jaleelethiyil is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ankitsud36 View Post
    my query was regarding whether railway has stepped up pay the pay of all promotees to minimum of pay corresponding to grade pay admissible,irrespective of the cadre in contra vention of CCS RP Rules 2008, if not then what wrong the railway has done?
    Ankit Sud
    Para 5 of this order clearly mentioned that stepping up of pay of senior promotee is possible only, if a direct appointed junior who is borne on the same seniority list drawing more pay than the senior,subjected to some condition given in this para.

  12. #12
    Junior Member spenke is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Hai friends
    Like in Railways, is the pay of seniors stepped up on par with their juniors in any other offices?
    For my earlier query on similar lines, Shri Jitender informed that stepping up of pay possible even with the existing rules of anamoly. I think, it does not work? As the present anamoly rules applicable only when the anamoly arises due to fixation of pay on promotion under FR 22.
    If any aware of such situations, kindly let me know the authority under which it was allowed?

    Even if it is allowed in case by case basis also, please inform me?

    Spenke

  13. #13
    Senior Member sundarar is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    631

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spenke View Post
    Hai friends
    Like in Railways, is the pay of seniors stepped up on par with their juniors in any other offices?
    For my earlier query on similar lines, Shri Jitender informed that stepping up of pay possible even with the existing rules of anamoly. I think, it does not work? As the present anamoly rules applicable only when the anamoly arises due to fixation of pay on promotion under FR 22.
    If any aware of such situations, kindly let me know the authority under which it was allowed?

    Even if it is allowed in case by case basis also, please inform me?

    Spenke
    Dear Sir,

    Yes please. Stepping up of pay of seniors on par with junior's pay fixed on promotion if the former's is lesser than the junior's pay, provided the junior should not have been drawn more pay than the senior in the lower grade from time to time - possible even with the existing rules for removal of anomaly and the same is reiterated in Note 10 under Rule 7 of CCS(RP) Rules, 2008. On promotion, the fixation of pay always take place under FR22, which is already known. As far as RB's Circular referred to in the discussion, according to me, since the stepping up provision is already existing in the case of promotion, what has been allowed through the circular is the stepping up of pay on par with the direct recruits, provided the cadre has the element of direct recruitment.
    That means, where certain posts are filled only by promotion, there the question of direct recruitment may not arise. But under 6th CPC's fixed amount of initial entry level pay in the pay band according to GP for a direct recruit after 1.1.2006, the need for removal of anomaly arises and hence the Circular - This is my view please.

    Accordingly on introduction of fixed pay in the pay band corresponding to grade pay as per 6th CPC recommendation for personnel recruited after 1.1.2006, the anomaly between a pre-2006 appointee/promotee and a post-2006 promotee/appointee is being removed by stepping up the pay on promotion/appointment on par with the junior is being removed by inter departmental anomaly Committee,

    At the same time, there is another type of anomaly that occurs in the case of post-2006 promotee when compared with a pre-2006 promotee.

    To illustrate with an example:

    Mr. A was promoted to the scale S-8 and got fixed his pay at minimum of the scale Rs.4500/- in the pre-revised scale of Rs.4500-125-7000 on 1.4.2008.

    While a similar employee Mr. B who was promoted to the same scale on 1.4.2005 and got fixed at Rs.4500/- ie. at the minimum of the scale will get his gets his pay in the pay band on 1.1.2006 by application of 1.86 mf which works out to Rs.4500x1.86 = Rs.8370, as far as Mr. A, 3% of his pre-promoted revised pay gets added to his existing pay in the pay band, but not stepped upto Rs.8370 when after adding the 3% increment with the existing pay in the pay band, the same happens to be lesser than 8370. Because, as per the provision of CCS(RP) Rules, it can be stepped upto only the minimum of the pay band, ie. Rs.5200, which question will not arise at all.

    Ultimately, though he was getting minimum of the pre-revised scale, viz. Rs.4500/- on 1.4.2008, on revision of his pay in the pre-promoted post as per 6th CPC w.e.f. 1.1.2006 and on fixation of pay in the revised structure on promotion, his pay happens to be lesser than the minimum of the pay band Rs.8370 as applicable to corresponding pre-revised scale's minimum ie. Rs.4500.

    My view is that a minimum pay in the pay band should always correspond with a minimum pay of its respective pre-revised scale minimum.

    First, it is to be noted that minimum of the 4 pay bands, while corresponding with the minimum of the lowest scale grouped under respective pay band particularly because, the pay in the pay band
    corresponding with the minimum of such a lowest scale is also same.
    But in respect of remaining scales grouped within the same pay band,
    the case is not so. Every pay scale minimum has its respective
    minimum pay in the pay band.

    The pay in the pay band is nothing but running pay in the pay band.
    At the same time, it cannot be lower than the corresponding pay in the pay band of a particular pre-revised scale of pay. While Grade Pay
    on promotion corresponds with a particular pre-revised scale of pay applicable to the promoted post, the minimum pay in the pay band on promotion also should correspond with the minimum of the promoted post's pre-revised scale. Otherwise, the Revised Pay on promotion,
    may not be corresponding with the pre-revised scale of the promoted post, in toto.

    Similarly, in the case of merged scales, for example, S-9, S-10 and S-11 merged into Rs.6500-200-10500 though the grade pay is allowed as applicable to the merged scale, the pay in the pay band as applicable to the upgraded scale ie. 6500-200-10500 is not allowed. Otherwise, the actual pay in the pay band shall start its journey from 6500x1.86=12090
    alongwith the gp Rs.4200 from 1.1.2006 particularly for persons at minimum of the respective scales, S-9 and S-10, ie. 5000 and 5500. Whereas the pay in the pay band in spite of merger is decided by application of 1.86 mf, ie. 5000 x 1.86 and 5500 x 1.86, but not 6500 x 1.86.

    Similarly in the case of upgraded scale, the pay scale Rs.6500-200-10500 has been upgraded to Rs.7450-225-11500. While, the GP Rs.4600 applicable to the upgraded grade is allowed, there is no change in the pay in the pay band. Otherwise, here too, the pay in the pay band, being running pay in the pay band, shall start its journey from 7450 x 1.86 = 13860.

    If a person was drawing Rs.7100/- on 1.1.2006 in the pre-revised scale Rs.6500-200-10500 and when the scale gets upgraded to Rs.7450-225-11500, his pay in the pay band is only Rs.7100x1.86=Rs.13210, but not Rs.13860. The GP Rs.4600 however is given because it is said to have been as applicable to the upgraded scale. There cannot a minimum less than a minimum.

    As long as it is maintained that both pay band and pay in the pay band are one and same, this problem do occur. The minimum of the pay band and the minimum of the pay in the pay band can never be one and same except the 4 scales, viz. S-4, S-9, Gr.A Entry and S-24.

    Once at minimum level the anomaly is removed by treating the minimum of the pay in the pay band will always correspond with the pre-revised scale minimum, the appropriate stages in the promoted scale's pre-revised pay will automatically get its applicable pay in the pay band corresponding to that stage.

    Because in the case of serving employees, such cases may be rare and hence the impact has not been realised. But in the case of pre-2006 pensioners, very hectic discussions had been taking place in Gconnect Discussion Forum and even cases are filed in courts to establish the fact that a minimum of the pay in the pay band will always correspond with its corresponding pre-revised scale minimum/bottom.

    The concept must be clear. There can be no minimum pay in the pay band irrespective of its pre-revised scale minimum, and even in the aforesaid 4 scales the minimum of the respective pay bands happens to be the minimum of the pay in the pay band also. As such, the minimum of the pay band can never be minimum of the pay in the pay band for remaining scales grouped alongwith it under a same pay band.

    Incidentally, the bottom of the revised pay shall necessarily correspond with the bottom of the pre-revised scale of pay even on promotion, merger, upgradation after 1.1.2006 if such a bottom of the revised pay happens to be lesser than minimum revised pay as applicable to a particular pre-revised scale, as every pre-revised scale do have a corresponding revised pay (consisting of pay in the pay band and gp, but not pay band and gp). Pay Band is just an identification of category like Gr.A, Gr.B, Gr.C and Gr.D and as such its minimum has nothing to do with revised pay/revised pension. It is Pay in the Pay Band that has been clearly defined under the CCS(RP) Rules, 2008 and hence a revision also shall be in terms of pay in the pay band only apart from GP which too has relevance to a corresponding pre-revised scale.

  14. #14
    Junior Member spenke is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Dear Sri Sunder

    Thank you very much for your reply. Please read the following case and if possible quote the relevant orders if any to solve it.
    Mr X (Promotee) was drawing pay of Rs 6900 in the pre-revised scale of 6500-200-10500 as on 1.1.2006. His pay was fixed at Rs 17640
    Mr Y (direct recruitee in the same post in the 2004) was drawing 6700 as on 1.1.2006 in the same scale. His pay was fixed at Rs 17270
    Mr Z (also direct recruitee in the same post appointed in the June 2006) was fixed at Rs 18150 from the date of his appointment.
    Is this anamoly rectified in the Revised Pay Rules.
    According to my knowledge it is not rectified.
    If I am correct, I would like to seek the information from Ministry Personnel, as I learnt that it would deal the same on case to case basis.

    Spenke

  15. #15
    Senior Member Victor is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    1,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spenke View Post
    Dear Sri Sunder

    Thank you very much for your reply. Please read the following case and if possible quote the relevant orders if any to solve it.
    Mr X (Promotee) was drawing pay of Rs 6900 in the pre-revised scale of 6500-200-10500 as on 1.1.2006. His pay was fixed at Rs 17640
    Mr Y (direct recruitee in the same post in the 2004) was drawing 6700 as on 1.1.2006 in the same scale. His pay was fixed at Rs 17270
    Mr Z (also direct recruitee in the same post appointed in the June 2006) was fixed at Rs 18150 from the date of his appointment.
    Is this anamoly rectified in the Revised Pay Rules.
    According to my knowledge it is not rectified.
    If I am correct, I would like to seek the information from Ministry Personnel, as I learnt that it would deal the same on case to case basis.

    Spenke
    There is no provision in CCS(RP) Rules, 2008 to rectify the anomaly indicated. The issue has to be dealt with on a case to case basis in consultation with the Department of Expenditure.

    Victor

  16. #16
    Senior Member sundarar is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    631

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spenke View Post
    Dear Sri Sunder

    Thank you very much for your reply. Please read the following case and if possible quote the relevant orders if any to solve it.
    Mr X (Promotee) was drawing pay of Rs 6900 in the pre-revised scale of 6500-200-10500 as on 1.1.2006. His pay was fixed at Rs 17640
    Mr Y (direct recruitee in the same post in the 2004) was drawing 6700 as on 1.1.2006 in the same scale. His pay was fixed at Rs 17270
    Mr Z (also direct recruitee in the same post appointed in the June 2006) was fixed at Rs 18150 from the date of his appointment.
    Is this anamoly rectified in the Revised Pay Rules.
    According to my knowledge it is not rectified.
    If I am correct, I would like to seek the information from Ministry Personnel, as I learnt that it would deal the same on case to case basis.

    Spenke
    Quote Originally Posted by spenke View Post
    Dear Sri Sunder

    Thank you very much for your reply. Please read the following case and if possible quote the relevant orders if any to solve it.
    Mr X (Promotee) was drawing pay of Rs 6900 in the pre-revised scale of 6500-200-10500 as on 1.1.2006. His pay was fixed at Rs 17640
    Mr Y (direct recruitee in the same post in the 2004) was drawing 6700 as on 1.1.2006 in the same scale. His pay was fixed at Rs 17270
    Mr Z (also direct recruitee in the same post appointed in the June 2006) was fixed at Rs 18150 from the date of his appointment.
    Is this anamoly rectified in the Revised Pay Rules.
    According to my knowledge it is not rectified.
    If I am correct, I would like to seek the information from Ministry Personnel, as I learnt that it would deal the same on case to case basis.

    Spenke
    Dear Sir,

    Mr. X's pay has nothing to do with the remaining two personnel. It is however,
    understood that he has been allowed the grade pay Rs.4800 as applicable to the upgraded pay scale 7500-12500 w.e.f. 1.1.2006. In that case, actually, his existing pay in the pre-upgraded scale being Rs.6900, that is less than the bottom/minimum of the upgraded scale minimum, his pay in the pay band also should correspond with such an upgraded scale w.e.f. 1.1.2006, ie. 7500 x 1.86 = 13950 + 4800= 18750. (This is what I was emphasising in my earlier post in the same thread as follows:Similarly in the case of upgraded scale, the pay scale Rs.6500-200-10500 has been upgraded to Rs.7450-225-11500. While, the GP Rs.4600 applicable to the upgraded grade is allowed, there is no change in the pay in the pay band. Otherwise, here too, the pay in the pay band, being running pay in the pay band, shall start its journey from 7450 x 1.86 = 13860.

    If a person was drawing Rs.7100/- on 1.1.2006 in the pre-revised scale Rs.6500-200-10500 and when the scale gets upgraded to Rs.7450-225-11500, his pay in the pay band is only Rs.7100x1.86=Rs.13210, but not Rs.13860. The GP Rs.4600 however is given because it is said to have been as applicable to the upgraded scale. There cannot a minimum less than a minimum). I wish to point out that the pay scale Rs.1400-2600 in respect of Sr. Stenographers whose corresponding revised scale previously was Rs.5500-9000 on 1.1.86 as per 4th CPC reco., the said scale was revised to Rs.1640-2900 at a later stage after a period of 12 years but retrospectively from 1.1.1986. Those who were drawing lesser pay than Rs.1640, got their pay stepped upto the minimum of the replaced/upgraded scale. Similar stepping up in the case of persons like Mr. X, to the minimum of the pay in the pay band corresponding to the upgraded scale Rs.7500/- shall be allowed, but it is not so, hence there is an anomaly. This has happened as the emphasis was incorrectly attached to minimum of the pay band rather than minimum of the pay in the pay band, and this aspect in particular was pointed out in my previous post.
    For removal of this anomaly, as Shri Victor has pointed out that only the DOE/MOF or DOP can have a final say. First requirement to understand the differentiation between a minimum of the pay band and minimum of the pay in the pay band. Though Mr. X is said to have been holding the pre-revised scale of Rs.7500-12500/- his revised pay at bottom is not corresponding to the pre-revised scale bottom ie. Rs.7500. This is the real anomaly.

    As far as Mr. Y and Mr. Z, the former being an appointee of pre-2006 and the latter a post-2006 appointee, for the purpose of stepping up of the former's pay on par with the latter one, has to be decided by the inter departmental anomaly committee with the Competent Authority's approval in the concerned dept. or otherwise with the concurrence of DOE/MOF or DOPT if need be. It is to be noted that in the case of Mr. Y too, his pay like Mr.X
    was not corresponding to his pre-revised revised scale bottom, ie. Rs.7500 and in his case also should be Rs.18750 although in such an event Mr. X and Mr. Y may happen to receive the same amount, Mr. X will retain his seniority over Mr. Y as usual.

    A minimum of the Pay in the Pay Band shall always correspond with its respective pre-revised scale of pay for the purpose of revision of pay/pension, is what we want to emphasise. On the contrary, the minimum of the pay band is being maintained as minimum of the pay in the pay band irrespective of pre-revised scale, and hence even in the case of fixation of pay on promotion after 1.1.2006, such anomaly very well exists, as illustrated in my previous post.

    Since such cases are quite few, the impact has not been realised and taken up appropriately so far, according to me.

  17. #17
    Junior Member spenke is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Hi friends

    Everybody might have seen the order of stepping up of pay of senior on par with direct recruits in respect of Income tax department. We may hope the same will follow in respect of other departments also.

    Spenke

  18. #18
    Senior Member tvenkatam is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    641

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spenke View Post
    Hi friends

    Everybody might have seen the order of stepping up of pay of senior on par with direct recruits in respect of Income tax department. We may hope the same will follow in respect of other departments also.

    Spenke
    Dear Friends,

    The order of CBDT is at the link below:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41240732/6...cers-2-11-2010

    Part of para 3 of this order reads as under:
    “As far as the matter relating to bringing the pay of existing Government servants as on 1.1.2006 at par with the pay of direct recruits recruited on or after 1.1.2006 is concerned, it is clarified that the pay of those Government servants who joined the Income Tax Department as direct recruits on or after 1.1.2006 is to be fixed as per Section II , Part ‘A’ of the First Schedule to the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 and the procedure of pay fixation is based on a specific recommendation of the Sixth Pay Commission, which has been accepted by the Government”.

    Can any one trace out the afore referred ‘specific recommendation’ of SCPC and recall when this recommendation was accepted by the Government?

  19. #19
    Senior Member sundarar is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    631

    Default Disparity between a post-2006 promotee and a DR

    The RB Order dated 17.2.2010 also indicates,
    "3. As far as the matter relating to bringing the pay of existing Railway servants as on 1.1.2006 at par with the pay of direct recruits recruited on or after 1.1.2006 is concerned, it is clarified that the pay of those Railway servants who joined the Railway as directrecruits on or after 1.1.2006 is to be fixed as per Section II, Part ‘A’ of the First Schedule to the RS(RP) Rules, 2008 and the procedure of pay fixation is based on a specific recommendation of the Sixth Pay Commission, which has been accepted by the Government. As far as pay fixation in respect to those Railway servants who were already in service on 1.1.2006 is concerned, the same is to be done as per the provisions of Rule 7 of RS(RP) Rules, 2008 and in accordance with the fitment tables annexed with this Ministry’s letter No.PC-VI/2008/I/RSRP/1 dated 11.9.2008.

    4. In the light of the foregoing, it is clarified that in terms of RS(RP) Rules,2008:-

    (a) no minimum pay in the pay band can be prescribed in the case of promotion of Railway servants from one grade to another (except in the case of change in pay band); and"

    As per para 4(a) above, there will be pay anomaly between a post-2006 promotee and a
    Direct Recruitee, where the pay in the pay band on fixation of pay on promotion of the post-2006 promotee happens to be lesser than that of the DR. While both will be holding same duties and responsibilities as has been in the case of pre-2006 promotee and post-2006 Direct Recruitee, by virtue of promotion, a promotee's pay shall not be reduced from than that of Direct Recruitee to the same post. As per the above para 4(a), in the
    case of change in the pay band, the minimum pay in the pay band is allowed for stepping up. In that case, only there will be only 4 pre-revised scales having same amount as min. of pb and min. of pay in the pay band. Whereas, the remaining 25 scales do have their own respective minimum pay in the pay band and when the same are existing, such minimum pay in the pay band can very well be prescribed in the case of promotees also wherever the pay in the pay band happens to be lesser than that of the pay in the pay band corresponding to the minimum of the pre-revised scale of the promoted post. A minimum of pay band is nothing but the minimum of the pay in the pay band corresponding to minimum of the lowest pre-revised scale grouped under such pay band. Prescribing such pay in the pay band for remaining pre-revised scales grouped under such pay band will not remove the disparity between a promotee and a direct recruitee after 2006. Like Every Pre-revised scale minimum has its corresponding minimum/bottom of the pay in the pay band, such a minimum/bottom of the pay in the pay band can at least be prescribed for a promotee of post-2006 too, even if the same happens to be lesser than that of a Direct Recruitee in whose case, a fixed element of pay in the pay band is prescribed.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Victor is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    1,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tvenkatam View Post
    Dear Friends,

    The order of CBDT is at the link below:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41240732/6...cers-2-11-2010

    Part of para 3 of this order reads as under:
    “As far as the matter relating to bringing the pay of existing Government servants as on 1.1.2006 at par with the pay of direct recruits recruited on or after 1.1.2006 is concerned, it is clarified that the pay of those Government servants who joined the Income Tax Department as direct recruits on or after 1.1.2006 is to be fixed as per Section II , Part ‘A’ of the First Schedule to the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 and the procedure of pay fixation is based on a specific recommendation of the Sixth Pay Commission, which has been accepted by the Government”.

    Can any one trace out the afore referred ‘specific recommendation’ of SCPC and recall when this recommendation was accepted by the Government?
    The "procedure" referred to above, could be para 2.2.22 (iv) of the 6CPC Report.

    Victor

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-03-2010, 04:05 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 31-08-2009, 02:59 PM
  3. Pay fixation of direct recruits after 01.01.2006
    By sbmaulik in forum Pay Fixation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-12-2008, 08:38 PM
  4. Pay for new Recruits
    By t.krishnasumanth in forum Pay Fixation
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-10-2008, 09:50 PM
  5. stepping up of pay at par with junior
    By P.V.Prasad in forum Pay Fixation
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-09-2008, 09:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts