+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Minimum quality for chatting in chatter box

  1. #1
    Member krishnan09 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2010

    Default Minimum quality for chatting in chatter box

    All viewers,
    I have been chatting in the chatter box of GC connect and the box was found verymuch useful for the Central Government Employees. Recently I found some bad elements wanted to tarnish the image of such plaftforum. I would like to narrate my bitter experence with one Mr.Sel.
    As and when people wanted to ask more doubts cleared according to their request I used to give my mobile number and e.mail. ID. Accordingly a months back Mr.Sel who has been chating in the chatter box wanted to get my number and the same was given to him. The very next day Mr.Sel made a call to my mobile number and introduced that he is Mr...Sel...(Selvan) etc. He further relvealed that he is working in Andaman and working Steno.Gr.I (6500-10,500) and after clearing his doubt, he wanted to continue talk and during dialouge he relvaled he belongs to Kerala in Kollam District and Working in National Sample Survey in Andaman. Soon after his talk I saved his number(9474293727) in my mobile . So we continued chatting in the chatter box. After some weeks, I received a mis call from the same number. Since I did not take the call, he sent a SMS from the same number in the name of Sunil Kumar and as I told he sent a mail to my E.mail ID seeking further clarification of fixation. His e-mail ID is "Sunil Kumar <[email protected]> ". That too I replied. There starts the problem, he started using unhealthy languages in the chatter box by name Mr.Sel, Mr.Sunil Kumar thereafter. Today(28.1.2010) also in the morning Mr.Sel, he used some unhealthy language while chatting. He wanted to escape from the roleply done by him. After wards there were shouting from Mr.Toophan and mr.Mohan-2 using unhealthy leanguage for aged persons.

    In the light of the above, I appeal the administrators of this GC connect, chatter box to kindly allow the people only after getting it registered with their name, full address and phone numbers etc.etc. After regisration also, the GC connect has to allow chatting after verification of at least mobile number. Otherwise, people like Mr.Sel, Mr.Sunil Kumar, Mr.Toofan and Mr.Mohan-2 etc.etc. may make use of this opportunity for unwanted and unhealthy dialogues.

    I hope appropriate action will be taken by GC Connect to keep away these bad elements for the good intention of the Central Govenrment Employees.
    Similarly I appeal to all the users to keep minimum standard of behaviour while communicating as the debates are not on personal views but based on what is available in the paper.

    By S. Krishnan
    Last edited by krishnan09; 28-01-2010 at 07:37 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member prasannakumar is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Payyanur, Kerala

    Default Minimum quality for chatting

    It is very sad a good fourm like Gconnect chat is being misused by some of the elements and this type of experience may occur to more of our members. My appeal to all is not to make use of this forum for any type of mischiefs and all possible measures should be taken to stem such behaviour.

    Prasanna Kumar

  3. #3
    Senior Member R K Rao is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008



    It is very unfortunate that I am working in an atomosphere where all the clerical staff are very junior to me and their exposure to admin work (interpretation of rules and regulations) is almost Nil.

    Even I was in a different (EDP) section pulled out and put in admin due to my having more number of years of service.

    Hence when the pay commission rules and the MACPs etc. came suddenly in one go from the top with a time frame to implement, I did not know where to look for because a wrong action will affect many employees or lead to a long and cumbersome arguments with audit.

    It is during this time I came across this GConnect forum. Here I saw clear clarifications, links to rules and considered opinions are offered by learned people in various fields in the govt. department. Due to this, whenever I am in doubt, I seek clarification or read clarification given on similar issues raised by others.

    Under such circumstances, it is sad to learn that misuse is being made (but to what end? and to benefit whom?). I hope goodwill will prevail and people will take right advantage of this good forum.

    Before ending just a thought - When such a good forum is there for all to see and read, why keep giving personal numbers etc. to others. Had this not been done, this sad incidence would not have taken place. If some one wants to clarify on a matter (his opinion) he can do so in the forum which will either be accepted by others or corrected if not considered to be in order.

    Hence, while I also feel that at least phone number verification can be done, if feasible, to have accountability and also the people unconvined with the clarifications or feeling let down should not resort to foul languages, it is also my feeling that we should restrict our exposure through this forum only, which could not be more transperent.


    Last edited by R K Rao; 28-01-2010 at 08:03 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. What is Minimum Pay in the Pay Band?
    By sundarar in forum Promotion, ACPS & MACPS
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-11-2011, 05:11 AM
  2. full Minimum Revised Pension for 20 years retiree
    By sundarar in forum Pensioners
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-03-2011, 04:45 AM
  3. Minmum In The Pay Band Or Minimum Of The Pay Band
    By RSundaram in forum Pensioners
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 23-10-2010, 05:14 PM
  4. Minimum 5% DA Due w.i.f Jan 2010
    By akraiism in forum Allowances
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 10:00 PM
  5. Invalid Minimum of Pay Band
    By sundarar in forum Pensioners
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-11-2008, 11:52 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts