PDA

View Full Version : Stenographers thread



parambilmohan
18-09-2008, 01:01 PM
My basic pay as on 1.1.06 = Rs.6350 (5000 scale)- increment January
Got ACP on 11.1.2007 = basic pay fixed 6725 (5500 scale)
Anybody can fix my pay as on 1.9.08 and calculate arrears
New HRA 20% - old hra 15%)

gconnectsna
18-09-2008, 04:06 PM
My basic pay as on 1.1.06 = Rs.6350 (5000 scale)- increment January
Got ACP on 11.1.2007 = basic pay fixed 6725 (5500 scale)
Anybody can fix my pay as on 1.9.08 and calculate arrears
New HRA 20% - old hra 15%)
Since your date of increment is 01-01 you will be granted increment in old scale and then your pay will be fixed in the revised scale. Assuming that your pay on 01-01-2006 in pre-revised scale after grant of increment is 6350 then.
Pay on 01-01-06 will be 11820+4200=16020 (PB-2 9300-34800, Grade pay 4200)
Pay on 01-07-2006 after increment will be 12310+4200=16510 (PB-2 9300-34800, Grade pay 4200)
Pay on ACP=12810+4600=17410 (PB-2 9300-34800, Grade pay 4600)
Calculate the arrears accordingly using above pay.

parambilmohan
19-09-2008, 11:20 AM
OK Thanks for your reply

parambilmohan
19-09-2008, 11:24 AM
Please clarify that :

Pay scale of 5000, 5500 etc. were merged and
fixed as 6500 scale.

My basic pay as on 1.1.2006 was Rs.6350/- in the scale of 5500.

Can I get the new basic pay on 1.1.06 as Rs.6500/-.

parambilmohan
25-09-2008, 04:16 PM
Please, can anybody clarify this

sa8298
12-01-2010, 02:53 PM
Look Gentlemen, The 6 P.C. and the Om referred above has revised the pay of Stenographer II and Assistants from 5000-8000 to 6500-10500 within 5 PC scales itself. However, consequent upon merging of 5000, 5500 and 6500 all those in the three above scales would be placed in Grade Pay of 4200. Through its recent order of granting 4600 Grade Pay for those whose pre-revised scale was 6500-10500 the government has uplifted the 6500 so called Gazetted guys to 4600. This order will not be applicable to
Stenographers II, and Assistants who were in 5000-8000 and have got the revised scale of 6500-10500 in 6 PC before placing them in 4200 GRADE PAY. The 13th October 2008, vide para 3, with clear example, insists that in case of upgradations of 6 P.C. the fitment table correasponding to the pre-revised scale should be used for fixation and not the revised scale, meaning that the the fixation for those posts who have been granted 6500-10500 revised scale (pre-revised scale 5000-8000) will be fixed directly from their basic and GP etc. in 5000-8000 with 1.86 factor in the PB-2. This act deprives them from the benefit that they would have got had they been placed in the revised scale of 6500-10500 and then placed in PB2. This sort of fixation is applicable to even those posts which have been upgraded to 7450 from 6500. The staff side has represented this anamoly to the anamoly committee and the Government in its meeting has communicated to re-consider this demand of staff side ONCEC AGAIN to provide for fixation of those posts which have been given revised scales in the revised scales and then revise their scales inthe 6 P.C. scales. (REFERENCE- MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF 12/12/09 OF THE ANAMALY COMMITTEE) Till then we will have to wait. The financial benefit in individual cases, especially to the new recruits (diffrential benefits) would be sumptuous in case the government agrees to this. But the Goverment has to agree to it, as it has accepted the parity recommended by the 6 P.C. In fact, it is the Government which required the 6 P.C. to recommend the parity in the possible areas through its reference note. Giving parity, and not accepting the parity in pay scales it is unjust.

Similarly, while recommending the parity, the 6 P.C. has also recommended the merger of the posts of Assistants with that of Stenographer II and stop the recruitment of Stenographers which the 6 PC feels redundant after the usage of computers and both the posts Assistants and Stenograper II as well as U.D.c and Stenographer III should be in a position to perform each other's function, as the Stenographers at various levels, in many field offices are performing the functions of UDC, Assistants even more than that as a versatile personality and master of all, already. If the Government issues orders to this effect, it will certainly give booster to the most efficient, knowledgeable, versatile, ambitious, but unfortunate, and stagnated lot of Stenographers, as it will open up many promotional avenues to them at par with other clerical babus. We will have to wait and see. There should also be a forum of Stenographers to discuss these issues by the stenographers.

Sathish

meenalax
12-01-2010, 08:10 PM
Dear sir,

My date of increment was January in V Pay Commission. I was drawing pay of Rs.5750/- as on 1.1.2005 in Steno Gr.II scale (5000-150-8000). I was on M.L. from July 2005 to 9th July 2006, so my increment was postponed to July 2006. In VI Pay Commission, how will my pay get fixed, since my increment is January and I was on leave. In my I.T. Dept. they fixed at Rs.5900/-. But Accounts people are objecting. Which one is right? Whether 5750/- or 5900/-. Please clarify.

Thankyou.

svsankar
12-01-2010, 08:32 PM
Mr Sathish has just reminded me of the good old proverb. " Niraikudam thalumbadhu".
svsankar.

sa8298
03-02-2010, 04:08 PM
I am confused with Mr. Shankar's reply whether to take it as a compliment or a sarcastic shot as it gives a meaning in both ways. Can he take a little more effort to clarify.

sundarar
04-02-2010, 06:17 AM
Please clarify that :

Pay scale of 5000, 5500 etc. were merged and
fixed as 6500 scale.

My basic pay as on 1.1.2006 was Rs.6350/- in the scale of 5500.

Can I get the new basic pay on 1.1.06 as Rs.6500/-.

According to me, the above question involving 5500-9000 scale remains unanswered. Actually, 6350 x 1.86 with GP Rs.4200 only has been allowed and not 6500 x 1.86 with GP Rs.4200.

Those who were holding the scale of 6500-10500 as on 1.1.2006 or after wards have been allowed GP Rs.4600 w.e.f. 1.1.2006 or afterwards (from the date they started drawing pay from that scale). Even in that case also, it is not 7450 x 1.86 but 6500 but actual pay drawn in the scale x 1.86. We know GP Rs.4600 is meant for 7450-11500. Whereas, as on 1.1.2006 or afterwards if a person drew a pay in 6500-10500 scale less than 7450 but more than 6500, in such cases also it is not 7450 x 1.86. The grievance at this point is that in such cases it shall be 7450 x 1.86.

In respect of those who were holding the scale of 5500-9000, the qualifying
service for promotion to next higher grade is determined by combining the
previous service rendered in the lower scale, viz. 5000-8000 also taken into account, for grant of Rs.4600 grade pay, and such promotion takes only prospective effect, mostly 1.7.2009 as I observed in some PSUs following Central Pay Scale and Career Progression by upgradation upto two levels. At the same time, induction level in those Depts. for Assistants was 4000-6000 and for stenographers it was 4500-7000. So, in r/o persons holding the scale 5000-8000 as on date, the revised qualifying service for promotion to next higher grade will apply, and at present they will continue to draw GP Rs.4200 although the scale is merged with 6500-10500. We can conclude that all the three scales have been notionally combined while the existing 6500-10500 is upgraded to 7450-11500 with GP Rs.4600.

The NAC recommendations will bring suitable solution, is the hope as on date.
The stenographers who were in the replaced scale of 1640 as on 1.1.1986 which was revised to 5500-8000 as on 1.1.1996 and presently undergoing revision from 1.1.2006 as stated above, have some other grievance that the Assistant Accountants who were also granted 1640 from 1.1.1986 on par with those stenographers after they sought legal remedy for parity with such stenographers, have been subsequently granted pay scale of 6500-10500 from 1.1.1996 and 7500-12000 from 1.1.2006, and thereby drawing a GP of Rs.4800 from 1.1.2006. The Stenographers of erstwhile
1640 from 1.1.86, are left with GP Rs.4200 at present owing to the disparity/gap that took place over the period. The Assistants case also exists among the said environment.

Like the replacement scale of 1640 introduced w.e.f. 1.1.1986 in the year 1997/1998, may the future have some remedial solution, it is expected.

svsankar
05-02-2010, 11:39 PM
Please take it as a compliment only. Stenographers being versatile, knowledgeable, efficient and ambitious should be patient and fight their case in a legitimate manner through their own resources. They need not compare themselves with other counterparts.
regards,
svsankar.